I don’t care if they thumb you down, Stretch. I like the term “lactard”! Now, to quantify, there are people who breast feed (99.9 percent of them) who are perfectly sane and wonderful. And there is a vocal .1 percent who are obsessed with their own ability to make milk. And they are “lactards”.
Two feet, ankles crossed. Top of the “L” is the right foot, heel at the top, toes middle. Horizontal bar of the “L” is the weirdly longer and misshapen left foot slanted sideways.
By which I mean, if you go on Wikipedia and look at the feet of old Chinese women who had their feet bound as children, this is exactly what it looks like.
You know, art after Picasso, proportions can show meaning, rather than literal, you know, bodily proportions, ok, I get that…and then there’s those feet.
They left out a word. Dismembered Lady in Milk, is what it should say. I imagine that she’s being soaked in milk prior to cooking to get rid of that gamey taste.
Those are feet. The top part is the palm of the right foot, toes pointing South. The tops of the toes rest on the crossed ankle of the left foot. The left foot looks abnormally long because it’s half-covered with milk.
(This one screams “feet” at me right away, but the proportionality of the painting makes it rather bizarre-looking altogether.)
This just makes me angry. There are so many really talented artists on Etsy. People with real talent. And they have less chance of being seen because the Etsy colon is clogged up with this shit.
I know everyone is obsessed with the length of her back, and the evident shortness of her legs, proportionately, but I just keep wondering to myself, who takes a bath in that position?
My paint skills are off the charts, I know, but it was really bothering me. At least she doesn’t look quite as dismembered. I couldn’t do anything about the phallic foot, but if I had a penis for a foot, I don’t know that I’d want it fixed, either.
It’s, like, a subtle commentary on the toxic content of today’s packaged products like milk. Or something. Or that’ll be the artist’s excuse before too long, anyway.
It’s a double-ended-dildo-shark. This rare shark’s native habitat is the bathtub, where it stalks its victims before entering into their anus or vagina and eating them from the inside out.
Since everyone’s commented on the ridiculously long torso and wonky feet, I’d like to call attention to her back. Specifically that indentation and how the milk pools there. That is one serious case of spinal stenosis.
katrina_von_bundt_kake
January 18, 2013 at 5:02 pm
The top of a woman, a ball sack and a twisted skeleton foot. What’s not to love?
I hope the artist doesn’t have huge student loans to pay off his Fine Art B.A.
That “photograph” disturbs me even more than the painting. Liquid would never form that way around a human back in Earth gravity. Plus, why is she letting her mannequin butt float above her in the tub like that? Is it a bath toy? I assume that’s why it’s so smooth and shiny.
I love the way male artists sometimes like to take female body parts and make them look like strange objects.
January 9, 2013 at 4:06 pm
Part of that looks like a foot. Rest of it? Hmm…maybe a pork chop.
January 9, 2013 at 4:18 pm
When you don’t have a rubber duckie on hand, you take what you find…
January 9, 2013 at 4:20 pm
Come on, haven’t you ever seen a whale fin before?
January 9, 2013 at 4:42 pm
I was going with lamb chop myself.
January 9, 2013 at 4:51 pm
It’s just a fluke.
January 9, 2013 at 5:24 pm
Don’t tell tails.
January 9, 2013 at 10:57 pm
OK I think a milk bath is even extreme for a breastfeeding lactard “How does she do it?!”
January 10, 2013 at 10:05 am
I don’t care if they thumb you down, Stretch. I like the term “lactard”! Now, to quantify, there are people who breast feed (99.9 percent of them) who are perfectly sane and wonderful. And there is a vocal .1 percent who are obsessed with their own ability to make milk. And they are “lactards”.
January 10, 2013 at 11:36 am
I’ve always heard “lactard” used to refer to someone with lactose intolerance. (And by always I mean by like two lactards I know.)
January 9, 2013 at 4:13 pm
Okay, this is totally the prequel to that episode of Bones where they found that dead body in the bathtub.
January 9, 2013 at 4:14 pm
Two feet, ankles crossed. Top of the “L” is the right foot, heel at the top, toes middle. Horizontal bar of the “L” is the weirdly longer and misshapen left foot slanted sideways.
January 9, 2013 at 4:25 pm
OH! ok I see it now. Thank you for fixing that in my head.
January 9, 2013 at 4:14 pm
I have heard of binding the foot but not stapling them together.
January 9, 2013 at 4:15 pm
One foot, one penis and scrotum.
January 10, 2013 at 7:19 am
that’s usually what I get in the bathtub… unless it’s italian night… “Oh, Vinny!”
January 10, 2013 at 9:54 am
Anyone else sing that to the tune of “One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer”?
January 9, 2013 at 4:16 pm
It’s a skeleton’s foot. She has company in the bath?
January 9, 2013 at 4:16 pm
As illustrated by H.R. Geiger
January 9, 2013 at 4:16 pm
That looks a lot like foot-binding…
January 11, 2013 at 6:31 am
By which I mean, if you go on Wikipedia and look at the feet of old Chinese women who had their feet bound as children, this is exactly what it looks like.
Is this some weird new fetish?
January 9, 2013 at 4:18 pm
No one else disturbed by the distance between her shoulders and her ass as being abnormally long?
January 9, 2013 at 4:38 pm
You know, art after Picasso, proportions can show meaning, rather than literal, you know, bodily proportions, ok, I get that…and then there’s those feet.
January 9, 2013 at 4:40 pm
That bothered me too. Maybe there are two people in there? Or a person and a spare butt.
January 10, 2013 at 8:48 am
We always keep a spare butt in the tub! You never know when yours will go flat.
January 9, 2013 at 4:44 pm
I estimate she has about forty vertebrae, considering how far her butt is from her head. She’s part snake?
January 10, 2013 at 8:27 am
there should be more parseltongue in porno, I guess..
January 9, 2013 at 8:28 pm
Count me in for being bothered as well. Possibly more than the feet thing, cuz some days my feet end up in crazy directions -shrug-
January 9, 2013 at 9:01 pm
And her ass seems oddly out of proportion. One butt-cheek is larger than her head.
January 10, 2013 at 8:00 am
I back also doesn’t bend like that?? Not comfortably, anyway….I guess it might if I were that long tho….
January 9, 2013 at 4:18 pm
HUGE ASS, tiny feet, teensy head.
What a waste of milk.
January 9, 2013 at 4:42 pm
One tiny foot, one huge foot.
January 10, 2013 at 8:04 am
Why does she have breasts on her back??
January 10, 2013 at 8:05 am
WTF, that was supposed to be it’s own comment, sorry…
January 11, 2013 at 8:50 am
That needs to be a haiku. Embroidered on a pillow.
January 9, 2013 at 4:22 pm
maybe that extra weird thing down at the end belongs to the person that belongs to the butt of the person giving head to the chick you can see…
January 9, 2013 at 4:24 pm
I don’t think that’s a foot… I think she took her toys to the bath.
January 9, 2013 at 4:27 pm
“that’s no foot…”
January 9, 2013 at 4:27 pm
They left out a word. Dismembered Lady in Milk, is what it should say. I imagine that she’s being soaked in milk prior to cooking to get rid of that gamey taste.
January 9, 2013 at 7:07 pm
Didmembered lady in milk with floating dismembered male genitalia.
January 9, 2013 at 8:02 pm
“Lait lady lait…”
January 9, 2013 at 10:59 pm
Latte lady latte!!
January 9, 2013 at 4:28 pm
Those are feet. The top part is the palm of the right foot, toes pointing South. The tops of the toes rest on the crossed ankle of the left foot. The left foot looks abnormally long because it’s half-covered with milk.
(This one screams “feet” at me right away, but the proportionality of the painting makes it rather bizarre-looking altogether.)
January 9, 2013 at 4:49 pm
I am also struck by the fact that this painting would be far more awesome if it had bubbles just aft of the butt…
January 10, 2013 at 8:44 am
So maybe I have the maturity of a 12-year-old boy, but I’m giggling hysterically at this comment right now.
January 9, 2013 at 4:33 pm
Is that a flesh coloured speculum?
January 9, 2013 at 4:39 pm
Milk and lady bits is a really terrible combo. I see a frantic midnight trip to walmart for some monistat.
January 9, 2013 at 4:40 pm
forget the feet, why does she have old woman boobs on her back?
January 9, 2013 at 4:48 pm
It was clearly unfinished. I fixed it.
January 9, 2013 at 4:54 pm
Gah, I verbalized your picture above without refreshing. You would be within your rights to whale on me.
January 9, 2013 at 5:04 pm
Are you fishing for attention?
January 9, 2013 at 5:23 pm
Krill me now.
January 9, 2013 at 6:12 pm
Don’t baleen-ient. I have it coming.
January 9, 2013 at 6:50 pm
Orca mon. You’re a right.
January 9, 2013 at 11:02 pm
Tuna in tomorrow for the correct answer
January 10, 2013 at 9:27 am
I haven’t the heart to thumb you down. Oh, whale.
January 9, 2013 at 4:50 pm
all I can say is how tall is this so called lady with that much space between those parts ?
January 9, 2013 at 4:57 pm
This just makes me angry. There are so many really talented artists on Etsy. People with real talent. And they have less chance of being seen because the Etsy colon is clogged up with this shit.
Time for a colonic Etsy, start jurying the site.
January 9, 2013 at 4:59 pm
ONE OF THOSE IS GOING TO WASH UP ON THE BEACH IN VANCOUVER. SORRY, LOCAL JOKE . . .
January 9, 2013 at 8:15 pm
High-five, fellow BCer! I admit to walking the breakwater in Victoria and looking for feet. I did not find any
January 10, 2013 at 3:03 pm
No no, it already did from the looks of it( not so local)
January 9, 2013 at 5:00 pm
It’s the Lacto Ness Monster! Get the the really shitty camera!
January 9, 2013 at 5:05 pm
Damn, and I thought *I* was long-waisted.
January 9, 2013 at 5:44 pm
Lucky you, I’ve just long been wasted.
January 9, 2013 at 5:18 pm
I have figured it out.
http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&safe=off&sa=X&tbo=d&biw=1037&bih=706&tbm=isch&tbnid=suYOZb7nKVwqOM:&imgrefurl=http://traumador.blogspot.com/2009/02/one-of-greatest-dinosaur-halls-ever-new.html&docid=TTCih7AlYi48vM&imgurl=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_vdMpbAB0DRI/SYoNZWy5iSI/AAAAAAAALBk/SwIjSyByA4E/s400/IMG_4116.JPG&w=300&h=400&ei=ORXuUO7IGoaB0QGu8YDIDg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=228&vpy=325&dur=461&hovh=156&hovw=118&tx=107&ty=92&sig=105858187919744613466&page=1&tbnh=138&tbnw=105&start=0&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:17,s:0,i:139
It’s a Corythosaurus skull.
January 9, 2013 at 6:10 pm
I think that’s the longest link I’ve ever seen, but I don’t care because it links to a page containing the phrase “great Canadian dinosaur rush”.
January 9, 2013 at 6:14 pm
Rush is a great Canadian dinosaur.
January 9, 2013 at 7:07 pm
It’s not Kosher.
January 9, 2013 at 7:41 pm
I’m pretty sure that’s a schlong on top of a dinosaur jawbone.
And I’m pretty sure, judging by its size and distance from her shoulders, that that’s someone else’s ass.
January 9, 2013 at 7:55 pm
I don’t know what everyone’s so freaked out about, since it’s obviously just the bread from yesterday.
Unless the bread from yesterday was . . . Oh, SHIT!
January 9, 2013 at 8:58 pm
What the hell kind of milk causes flesh to melt off the bone?
January 9, 2013 at 11:27 pm
I know everyone is obsessed with the length of her back, and the evident shortness of her legs, proportionately, but I just keep wondering to myself, who takes a bath in that position?
And why?
January 10, 2013 at 7:44 am
So glad I wasn’t the only one who thought that. Look anatomically impossible to me, unless you have butt cheek implants.
January 10, 2013 at 12:08 pm
True enough, but I think “who the hell baths IN MILK?” might be the thing to ask first.
January 10, 2013 at 12:44 am
My paint skills are off the charts, I know, but it was really bothering me. At least she doesn’t look quite as dismembered. I couldn’t do anything about the phallic foot, but if I had a penis for a foot, I don’t know that I’d want it fixed, either.
January 10, 2013 at 1:59 am
Duurrrr! Clearly, it’s her rudder! What, you don’t have one?
January 10, 2013 at 6:02 am
It’s, like, a subtle commentary on the toxic content of today’s packaged products like milk. Or something. Or that’ll be the artist’s excuse before too long, anyway.
January 10, 2013 at 6:11 am
It’s not milk, it’s acid and this is clearly from an episode of “Breaking Bad”. She wronged Walter White in some horrible way.
January 10, 2013 at 9:05 am
Didn’t Thoreau say something about a trout in the milk?
January 11, 2013 at 6:37 am
It’s a double-ended-dildo-shark. This rare shark’s native habitat is the bathtub, where it stalks its victims before entering into their anus or vagina and eating them from the inside out.
January 11, 2013 at 8:06 am
C’mon! Clearly is Nessie, the Loch Ness Monster. Or Champy, the Lake Champlain Monster. Either one.
January 11, 2013 at 6:30 pm
Since everyone’s commented on the ridiculously long torso and wonky feet, I’d like to call attention to her back. Specifically that indentation and how the milk pools there. That is one serious case of spinal stenosis.
January 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm
Here’s the original link –
oh wait, sorry:
http://stefangrosjean.deviantart.com/art/My-Goodies-130092277
January 12, 2013 at 10:54 pm
That makes more sense. The back, butt, and vestigial arm attached to her ankle should have been drawn closer together.
January 15, 2013 at 9:55 pm
Why is her butt so shiny?
January 12, 2013 at 10:56 pm
The painting ships for $10 from Romania. He’s in for a shock if someone in the US pays him $40 for it.
January 18, 2013 at 5:02 pm
The top of a woman, a ball sack and a twisted skeleton foot. What’s not to love?
I hope the artist doesn’t have huge student loans to pay off his Fine Art B.A.
January 19, 2013 at 6:42 pm
That “photograph” disturbs me even more than the painting. Liquid would never form that way around a human back in Earth gravity. Plus, why is she letting her mannequin butt float above her in the tub like that? Is it a bath toy? I assume that’s why it’s so smooth and shiny.
I love the way male artists sometimes like to take female body parts and make them look like strange objects.