I didn’t realize it was the leotard until this comment made me go back and read the copy. Seriously, who wants to buy anything she had to dig out of her ass?
Actually, there’s probably a major market for that, I just didn’t realize it was Etsy.
I’m pretty sure I have a yearbook with a photo of this leotard on the school dance troupe. Our principal demanded that we wear opaque tights so we would avoid the above look.
Didn’t anyone tell her that Abercrombie lawyers will sue her for copyright infringement? They have the corner on the “let’s obscure our actual clothes with lots of nekkid-ness” market?
This drives home for me that I really don’t want to buy clothes that have been modeled against someone else’s naked body. Especially ones that would end up in intimate contact with my body.
$110 dollars????? I have an unworn Playskin (by Danskin) leotard straight out of the 70s. if someone actually pays $110 for the above leotard i’m sure as shit putting mine up. I’ll just have to figure out another way to achieve that crazy indie look.
The edge of her sleeve exactly lines up with the edge of the baseboard behind her. It’s producing a trippy “camouflage” effect for me, as though her arm and hand are just a trompe l’oueille painting on the wall and floor.
July 19, 2011 at 9:59 am
If I just looked at the photo, I’d assume that she was selling hideous shoes.
July 19, 2011 at 10:49 am
I didn’t realize it was the leotard until this comment made me go back and read the copy. Seriously, who wants to buy anything she had to dig out of her ass?
Actually, there’s probably a major market for that, I just didn’t realize it was Etsy.
July 19, 2011 at 11:56 am
You’re right; I think this might get a more accurate value from a vending machine in Tokyo.
July 19, 2011 at 5:42 pm
Heck, in Tokyo, you could buy it out of the same vending machine as an Armani tie and a 20-year-old bottle of Scotch.
July 19, 2011 at 11:26 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
July 19, 2011 at 9:59 am
I’m pretty sure I have a yearbook with a photo of this leotard on the school dance troupe. Our principal demanded that we wear opaque tights so we would avoid the above look.
July 19, 2011 at 10:00 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
July 19, 2011 at 10:01 am
her floor is really clean… thats a nice change.
July 19, 2011 at 10:03 am
I guess those horrid sandals are Fit Flops?
July 19, 2011 at 10:38 am
If by fit you mean pole then yes.
July 19, 2011 at 9:15 pm
Naw, just hard to walk in for no reason at all.
July 19, 2011 at 10:08 am
You… you can’t see the product that is being sold for the flesh that’s selling it.
July 19, 2011 at 10:11 am
That’s gotta be one hell of a balance beam routine! That or she passed up the uneven bars for the vertical bar.
July 19, 2011 at 10:11 am
Wow, so I went to high school with this girl…
July 19, 2011 at 10:45 am
When you see her at the reunion ask her how her Vagoo is doing.
July 19, 2011 at 10:59 am
I most certainly will
July 19, 2011 at 12:06 pm
I’m fine!
July 19, 2011 at 10:12 am
There’s a crazy indie look in leotards now? I feel old.
July 19, 2011 at 3:47 pm
Yep. All you hoes get offa my lawn!
July 19, 2011 at 10:12 am
She needs to take what she makes from this listing and purchase a comb. And if there’s change, she needs to look into buying some class.
July 19, 2011 at 1:21 pm
And a giant bottle of conditioner.
Also, I’m not a fan of the tattoos on her feet unless there’s some significance I’m missing.
July 19, 2011 at 10:13 am
Didn’t anyone tell her that Abercrombie lawyers will sue her for copyright infringement? They have the corner on the “let’s obscure our actual clothes with lots of nekkid-ness” market?
July 19, 2011 at 10:14 am
I think those are the same shoes Mary-Lou Retton wore in ’84.
July 19, 2011 at 10:16 am
This drives home for me that I really don’t want to buy clothes that have been modeled against someone else’s naked body. Especially ones that would end up in intimate contact with my body.
July 19, 2011 at 11:12 am
Pubic lice will cost you an extra $20…
July 19, 2011 at 1:13 pm
Rana, I was thinking the same thing. But this isn’t even the worst picture. Click the Etsy link and view the first photo!
July 19, 2011 at 3:49 pm
Egads, her hair gets worse, too! Check photo 3.
July 19, 2011 at 6:47 pm
She forgot the Golden Rule!!!
July 19, 2011 at 10:18 am
$110 dollars????? I have an unworn Playskin (by Danskin) leotard straight out of the 70s. if someone actually pays $110 for the above leotard i’m sure as shit putting mine up. I’ll just have to figure out another way to achieve that crazy indie look.
July 19, 2011 at 10:18 am
She’s gonna twist her ankle on her dismount!
July 19, 2011 at 11:58 am
She doesn’t have as far from the landing as most gymnasts. Mattresses on the floor are like three feet shorter than balance beams.
July 19, 2011 at 10:19 am
Reminds me of American Apparel ads. Not a good thing.
July 19, 2011 at 10:19 am
Who wants to wear that when her lady region has been all over it?
July 19, 2011 at 10:36 am
I call “Shenanigans”! She is NOT a size small; why would some one want to BUY a stretched out leotard?
July 19, 2011 at 11:44 am
You never know, she could be four-foot-eight.
July 19, 2011 at 10:37 am
Are those orange diagonal stripes part of the leotard or is it just her spray tan bleeding through?
July 19, 2011 at 10:38 am
And the Russian judge gives her a 2.
July 19, 2011 at 10:47 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
July 19, 2011 at 11:10 am
Seriously? You call THOSE Clydesdale thighs? I’m crying.
July 19, 2011 at 11:20 am
I’ve seen her in other pictures, where she looks nicely shaped, the camera angle here has distorted her thighs badly.
July 19, 2011 at 12:02 pm
I think the thighs are nice, but they are COVERING the product.
July 19, 2011 at 11:52 am
I HAVE CURVES, THANK YOU VERY MUCH! -snapsnapsnap-
July 19, 2011 at 12:43 pm
so do i thank you very much, i also know that in some light my muscular arms look like sloppy joe arms..camera angle is key, as is lighting.
July 19, 2011 at 12:43 pm
btw clydesdales are muscular, not fat
July 19, 2011 at 10:48 am
She’s going to snap her tibia in half on the dismount in those shoes
July 19, 2011 at 9:18 pm
heh heh… I read “labia”…also quite possible!
July 19, 2011 at 10:57 am
Do the crabs cost extra?
July 19, 2011 at 11:14 am
Pets included?
July 19, 2011 at 11:40 am
Crazy? Yes.
Indie? Not so much.
July 19, 2011 at 12:30 pm
So was greasing yourself up before your photo shoot part of the Esty selling seminar?
July 19, 2011 at 12:44 pm
I think she just screwed up. This was the pic she meant to send to her boyfriend. He got the one she meant to post on Etsy.
July 19, 2011 at 12:47 pm
My those are some sparkly legs.
July 19, 2011 at 1:20 pm
The product description tries to sell this leotard as “clean and fresh”.
July 19, 2011 at 3:17 pm
Tries.
July 19, 2011 at 1:24 pm
The edge of her sleeve exactly lines up with the edge of the baseboard behind her. It’s producing a trippy “camouflage” effect for me, as though her arm and hand are just a trompe l’oueille painting on the wall and floor.
Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
July 19, 2011 at 3:12 pm
oh, boy, that leotard’s coming with some major spray-tan stains on it. And not on the sleeves, it seems.
Doesn’t it bug anybody that you can’t actually SEE THE FUCKING LEOTARD?
July 19, 2011 at 3:52 pm
Joy from “My Name Is Earl”
July 19, 2011 at 6:18 pm
Joy has better hair.
July 19, 2011 at 8:06 pm
Like Tom Servo would say-”She barrowed my leotard and she pitted it out!!!!!”
July 19, 2011 at 8:43 pm
I would like to see her get off the floor in those shoes.
July 20, 2011 at 6:08 am
I don’t know if it’s for sale, but I wanna poker…