“Please wash this garment by hand in cold water to protect its delicate parts.” You put a TONGUE RING on a BABY PICTURE and you’re worried about this shirt’s DELICATE PARTS??!!!
Oh, cool, so handy to have camouflage…for when I need to blend in at the butterfly enclosure. (note, only if slim – otherwise the little nectar suckers will see you, land on your eyes and drain your tears).
really Kool aid dyed roving, tacked into place..not even felted, all you have to do is tug and it will come apart…it is just a hank of un spun wool fibers
This is one of those social warnings- very handy. If I see someone wearing this, I know I’m gonna find them pretentious, annoying and dumb as a box of rocks (and probably unicorn/ patchouli scented) so I have time to turn around and get away.
Yeah, I’m making assumptions. Absofuckinlutely I am.
Ann Coulter may be a “slim grown woman” but she is afraid of being playful, for playfulness is part of the liberal agenda to turn your children gay. (That baby’s rainbow hair is just the start, people!)
I was going to say that the butterfly fabric is the one thing about this halter that’s not wacky. Other than that “unique garment” is probably the only somewhat fitting term the seller used in the description.
For me those “NO FEAR” (brand) car stickers that were all over the place a few years ago were a giveaway- looking at the drivers of those cars just brought “brain damaged- or soon to be” right to mind.
Don’t mind me, feeling crankypants today.
Stupid tiny keys! I meant to say that what I am about to post us off topic, but your post reminded me of an office where I worked about 10 years ago. Some bimbo applied for a secretarial job and the HR person saw her getting out of her car, which had a “SEXY BLONDE BITCH” decal all across the windshield. She probably has no idea why she didn’t get the job.
My favorite part is the blatant stitching right along the baby’s chubby cheeks. Its so rugged and endearing and creepy all at once. Wouldn’t one want to use transfer paper on a printed image anyway? Just iron it on? Or was that not daring enough?
I can’t decide what’s more disturbing, the shirt alone or the “Who wore it better?”
Either way, this is why I have pictures of kittens right in front of my computer.
“My kid was breastfeeding, and her tongue got caught on my nipple piercing. She got so upset that she spit up all over my shirt. (Curiously, she spit up in rainbow colors. I wonder what she’s been eating in all that time I haven’t been watching her.) Her expression, with that furrowed brow, was so funny I had to take a picture. I made this to commemorate the occasion. I’m going to wear it to her wedding. It’ll make for a hilarious anecdote!”
I did remember them, actually. I just didn’t see a good way to fit them in this time. Besides, it’s been a couple of weeks now; I think the cole slaw’s getting old.
The best part of this was turning my head just in time to watch the slow progression of my husband’s complete and utter confusion as he tried to take in the Who Wore it Better? and make any sense out of it.
It was like trying to watch a very smart dog try to crack a safe.
Not to be picky, but horns don’t shed. That would be a unicorn antler. And what the hell do unicorns smell like anyway? Muskox with a touch of rose oil? WTF?
May 29, 2011 at 4:32 pm
Sexy and fun, hmmm, Who knew that’s what I was missing in life.
May 29, 2011 at 5:51 pm
Don’t forget poorly made!
May 29, 2011 at 7:56 pm
Yes, but why “Crazy Club” Kid?
signed,
Confused
May 29, 2011 at 8:27 pm
Because anyone who’d even consider wearing (or making) this is obviously crazy, of course.
May 29, 2011 at 4:33 pm
It’s the tongue stud that puts it over the top for me.
May 29, 2011 at 5:49 pm
I like the unintentionally furrowed brow.
May 30, 2011 at 12:06 am
im not sure thats unintentional but it looks properly perplexed. it fits.
May 29, 2011 at 6:25 pm
“Please wash this garment by hand in cold water to protect its delicate parts.” You put a TONGUE RING on a BABY PICTURE and you’re worried about this shirt’s DELICATE PARTS??!!!
May 30, 2011 at 12:43 am
Maybe there’s a vagoo somewhere on it we can’t see.
May 29, 2011 at 4:39 pm
Oh, cool, so handy to have camouflage…for when I need to blend in at the butterfly enclosure. (note, only if slim – otherwise the little nectar suckers will see you, land on your eyes and drain your tears).
May 29, 2011 at 4:41 pm
It looks like she murdered a Muppet & draped it over her breasts as a trophy.
May 31, 2011 at 10:57 pm
Looks like a Cabbage Patch Kid
May 29, 2011 at 4:41 pm
I lie how even the shirt seems to have an “I demand an explanation for this bullshit” expression on its face.
May 29, 2011 at 4:42 pm
What’s with the yarn dreadlocks? Isn’t that child being humiliated enough with its tongue-studded photo on a halter?
May 29, 2011 at 5:39 pm
Until I read the descripiton I thought it was a felted toy snake draped over her shoulders, not part of the shirt.
May 29, 2011 at 8:43 pm
I think that’s actually a piece of unspun (possibly felted) roving, not yarn. Either way, it’s still a train wreck.
May 29, 2011 at 4:46 pm
This is what makes me stop and move to the other side of the street. Don’t follow it!
May 29, 2011 at 4:47 pm
I can’t decide if this is a bad bad joke or child abuse.
May 29, 2011 at 4:56 pm
Is that baby’s tongue pierced? Has to be real fun breastfeeding that babe.
May 31, 2011 at 4:38 am
Even worse if your nipple is pierced too…
May 29, 2011 at 4:56 pm
That is not YARN that is roving…. that is all
May 29, 2011 at 5:04 pm
That top is frightening enough as it is. Although…roving could be needled-felted into submission, if the need arises.
May 30, 2011 at 5:03 pm
really Kool aid dyed roving, tacked into place..not even felted, all you have to do is tug and it will come apart…it is just a hank of un spun wool fibers
May 29, 2011 at 5:36 pm
and why so lopsided?
May 29, 2011 at 4:59 pm
Like camouflage, but even better! So, look for the US army to be sporting these soon. Sure to frighten any terrorist.
May 29, 2011 at 5:02 pm
This is one of those social warnings- very handy. If I see someone wearing this, I know I’m gonna find them pretentious, annoying and dumb as a box of rocks (and probably unicorn/ patchouli scented) so I have time to turn around and get away.
Yeah, I’m making assumptions. Absofuckinlutely I am.
May 29, 2011 at 5:54 pm
Also tasteless and money-wasting. It’s almost like a résumé for stupid people.
May 29, 2011 at 5:02 pm
I have a recurring dream where I’m pounding Ann Coulter’s face in and it’s one of my favourites. Now I’ll probably have it tonight, so I thank you. <3
May 29, 2011 at 5:43 pm
Carefuly not to cut yourself – bones are sharp.
May 29, 2011 at 6:09 pm
I have a recurring dream in which I’m pounding Ann Coulter, too.
May 29, 2011 at 6:12 pm
while making her listen to the audio book of “The Audacity of Hope”.
May 29, 2011 at 8:48 pm
You are evil and wonderful.
May 30, 2011 at 12:44 am
My BF has that last name, and from the beginning when he met me he hurried to reassure me that he was not at all related.
May 29, 2011 at 5:04 pm
No matter what,that is ONE ugly halter…
May 29, 2011 at 5:08 pm
A definite improvement!
May 29, 2011 at 5:09 pm
Now if you leave the cat and get rid of the rest, that’ll be even better.
May 29, 2011 at 5:16 pm
I’d buy it.
May 29, 2011 at 5:46 pm
You forgot the tongue stud!
May 30, 2011 at 5:50 am
Uh, yeah, you put the tongue ring on that cat!
May 29, 2011 at 5:07 pm
Err..
The words “sexy” and “kid” really shouldn’t be in the same listing.
May 29, 2011 at 5:56 pm
Or the word “sexy” with this photo.
May 29, 2011 at 8:29 pm
Try telling that to Abercrombie & Fitch.
May 29, 2011 at 5:09 pm
Ann Coulter may be a “slim grown woman” but she is afraid of being playful, for playfulness is part of the liberal agenda to turn your children gay. (That baby’s rainbow hair is just the start, people!)
May 29, 2011 at 5:10 pm
I really didn’t think it was possible to make Anne look even worse. Kudos to you.
May 29, 2011 at 5:15 pm
Geez, it’s like these sellers are TRYING to get on Regretsy!
May 29, 2011 at 5:28 pm
Yeah, those were really super wacky butterflies. Some might venture to say just down right zany!
May 30, 2011 at 12:13 am
I was going to say that the butterfly fabric is the one thing about this halter that’s not wacky. Other than that “unique garment” is probably the only somewhat fitting term the seller used in the description.
May 29, 2011 at 5:29 pm
It somehow makes the model look fat, even though she has a nice figure.
May 29, 2011 at 5:41 pm
Girl, you don’t look a day over 4!
I was trying to imagine how scary it would be to see some woman at a club with that tacky hair and an actual baby face, I might have nightmares.
May 29, 2011 at 5:42 pm
All these years and I never realized that “fearless” was a synonym for “brain damaged.”
May 29, 2011 at 6:52 pm
For me those “NO FEAR” (brand) car stickers that were all over the place a few years ago were a giveaway- looking at the drivers of those cars just brought “brain damaged- or soon to be” right to mind.
Don’t mind me, feeling crankypants today.
May 29, 2011 at 8:21 pm
It’s off topic
May 29, 2011 at 8:26 pm
Stupid tiny keys! I meant to say that what I am about to post us off topic, but your post reminded me of an office where I worked about 10 years ago. Some bimbo applied for a secretarial job and the HR person saw her getting out of her car, which had a “SEXY BLONDE BITCH” decal all across the windshield. She probably has no idea why she didn’t get the job.
May 29, 2011 at 8:50 pm
Buzz & Kacky,
At least it is thoughtful of the fucktards to let us know so that we can avoid them.
May 30, 2011 at 7:14 am
That’s true. You can see `em coming.
May 29, 2011 at 5:48 pm
I think Keith Olberman could pull it off. He’s got enough of a sense of humor he’d be laughing at himself right along with the rest of us.
May 29, 2011 at 5:58 pm
But please tell me that’s his face ‘shopped onto someone else’s body. A farmer’s tan just does not seem appropriate to him.
May 31, 2011 at 4:41 am
Olbermann only has a sense of humor when it comes at the expense of others. He seems quite thin-skinned when the criticism is pointed back at him.
May 29, 2011 at 5:50 pm
My favorite part is the blatant stitching right along the baby’s chubby cheeks. Its so rugged and endearing and creepy all at once. Wouldn’t one want to use transfer paper on a printed image anyway? Just iron it on? Or was that not daring enough?
May 29, 2011 at 5:57 pm
Hand-stitching shows it’s hand-made and OOAK and that she’s not a reseller.
May 29, 2011 at 5:59 pm
But doing it poorly just adds talentless to the tasteless.
May 29, 2011 at 6:09 pm
I agree with you, but I wasn’t defending the seller! I meant it as sarcasm, which doesn’t always work in writing.
May 29, 2011 at 6:31 pm
I didn’t take your comment as defending, I was just elaborating on it. All is well. Want a beer?
May 31, 2011 at 9:38 am
Kimoutre, I like your style. First round’s on me!
May 29, 2011 at 5:51 pm
I like edgy fashion but it at least has to be well-made. Frigging craftard macaroni-gluers.
May 29, 2011 at 5:52 pm
I can’t decide what’s more disturbing, the shirt alone or the “Who wore it better?”
Either way, this is why I have pictures of kittens right in front of my computer.
May 30, 2011 at 1:19 am
Hell with that, this is why I have =kittens= right in front of my computer! (I foster for my local shelter – it’s very fun)
May 29, 2011 at 5:55 pm
If these is the poor things idea of fun and sexy and foresee many lonely years ahead for her – unless she stops by the psychiatric ward.
May 29, 2011 at 5:57 pm
too bad the listing’s been taken down. I can only imagine how fast that would have sold.
May 29, 2011 at 6:11 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
May 29, 2011 at 6:25 pm
“My kid was breastfeeding, and her tongue got caught on my nipple piercing. She got so upset that she spit up all over my shirt. (Curiously, she spit up in rainbow colors. I wonder what she’s been eating in all that time I haven’t been watching her.) Her expression, with that furrowed brow, was so funny I had to take a picture. I made this to commemorate the occasion. I’m going to wear it to her wedding. It’ll make for a hilarious anecdote!”
May 29, 2011 at 8:28 pm
Probably closer to the truth
May 29, 2011 at 10:55 pm
‘Fess up – you snuck out for the Etsy writing seminar, didn’t you? But you forgot the Zydeco & coleslaw.
May 30, 2011 at 2:00 am
I did remember them, actually. I just didn’t see a good way to fit them in this time. Besides, it’s been a couple of weeks now; I think the cole slaw’s getting old.
May 30, 2011 at 4:54 pm
Or at least moldy.
May 29, 2011 at 6:29 pm
May 29, 2011 at 7:00 pm
now it’s Steampunk!
May 29, 2011 at 7:23 pm
I daresay that the octopus actually improves the shirt.
…what is the world coming to?
May 30, 2011 at 3:14 am
It looks like the octopus has one of those icon halos. Is it a holy octopus?
May 29, 2011 at 6:35 pm
Shoppping service announcement
For those of you who loved but coulnd’t get one of athomewithPJ’s dolls, she has a new goth doll up as well
http://www.etsy.com/listing/72905576/goth-doll-soft-plush-yarn-haired-doll as well as some in colors. Only reason I’m so generous is I got MY goth doll in the mail last week, he he.
May 29, 2011 at 7:22 pm
I wonder if the baby gets modeling royalties.
May 29, 2011 at 8:34 pm
I hope so. He can use it to pay for the therapy he’ll need if he finds out about this shirt one day,
May 29, 2011 at 7:37 pm
The best part of this was turning my head just in time to watch the slow progression of my husband’s complete and utter confusion as he tried to take in the Who Wore it Better? and make any sense out of it.
It was like trying to watch a very smart dog try to crack a safe.
May 29, 2011 at 7:39 pm
You just have to step in. It can’t go on. Dog’s don’t have thumbs, for one thing.
May 29, 2011 at 7:46 pm
There’s one bit of truth in the description. This thing is definitely a ‘halter’. It made me halt, then back away slowly…
May 29, 2011 at 10:06 pm
May 29, 2011 at 10:07 pm
Not sure why the arms and such look posterized. Could be the server. Consider it a design feature.
May 29, 2011 at 10:40 pm
Cupcakes don’t help either.
May 30, 2011 at 12:03 am
but it does make me hungry
May 30, 2011 at 12:04 am
They may not help this look better, but the more cupcakey something is, the better it’s chances of getting on Etsy’s front page, right?
May 29, 2011 at 11:14 pm
Does anyone else think chest baby looks like he has a diseased colon growing out of his head? Anyone?
May 30, 2011 at 12:05 am
Yes.
May 30, 2011 at 5:00 am
So there’s a creepy baby face with a tongue pierceing and a rainbow snake for hair… but it’s the butterfly pattern that’s considered “whacky” ???
May 30, 2011 at 8:53 am
True, does make you wonder if she considers the print the crazy part and the rest of it normal? Can you imagine her work clothes?
May 30, 2011 at 7:48 am
Ann Coulter would look better with it shoved in her arse.
May 30, 2011 at 8:54 am
As the old jok goes.. Where do you put it becuae she looks all ass to me?
May 30, 2011 at 9:56 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
May 31, 2011 at 10:09 am
OK, I have to ask… where do you where this shirt?
May 31, 2011 at 3:49 pm
I’ve actually never worn it…. it mainly just hangs out in my closet.
May 30, 2011 at 10:22 am
Slim grown women only, sorry no fatties in this bad ass shirt!
huh???
May 30, 2011 at 1:52 pm
I was just casually checking up on regretsy and scrolling thru the weekends post when i saw this and almost threw up My sprinkley Memorial day cookie.
May 30, 2011 at 8:00 pm
What the…wow I don’t even know. It like a baby with a rainbow cat turd on top of its head.
June 1, 2011 at 1:07 am
Not to be picky, but horns don’t shed. That would be a unicorn antler. And what the hell do unicorns smell like anyway? Muskox with a touch of rose oil? WTF?
September 28, 2011 at 1:06 am
Ann Coulter? Bitch please. Keith totally rocked that shit. The farmer tan just makes it, yanno?