This is great! I love walking around in my underwear, but hate having my belly button exposed. And I can store all my bras inside that one while I wear it!
I would never wear underwear that’s been preworn. And she has a ton of support for such a little bosom. I usually don’t comment badly about people but this is just bad bad bad.
So many thoughts spring to mind!
“That Bra doesn’t fit”
“Oh, because that is a man”
look at store
“IS that a man? I don’t know! Gender confusion!”
*sobbing*
Who wears bras like that if they don’t have to? I expend a great deal of energy trying to find bras in my size that DON’T look like that. I guess the grass is always greener on the other side … curly haired girls want straight hair and flat chested women want ugly bras.
Damn right those aren’t my grandma’s panties; that lady had some downright sexy stuff, not boring industrial-strength knickers.
(side note: there’s sort of a weird feeling when you’re clearing out a deceased grandmother’s closets and you realise that all her undergarments are a lot nicer and more come-hither than yours.)
Also, I imagine that being able to purchase those fresh off the model’s twat will be a big hit with the dirty panty fetish crowd.
Unfortunately, this reminds me of the time I woke up in Tijuana with a bad headache, a tattoo, and no wallet. If it weren’t for the donkey and hooker named Brutus, I would have never made it home. Strange for a Mexican girl to be named Brutus,….
I have a hard time enough time buying second hand shoes and those just go on my feet. There’s no way I would buy used panties, no matter whose granny wore them. That’s taking the vintage verisimilitude too far.
If you think it’s easy to find an adorable A-cup, let me tell you what. It’s not. However, that is why A-cups should not be modeling in their ugly bras on Etsy. What were they thinking?!?
Vintage panties, eh? So when you say you catch crabs from them you can impress your friends by saying, “Yeah, but they’re vintage crabs. These aren’t your grandma’s pubic lice.”
“So never judge a book by it’s cover
Or who you’re going to love by your lover
Love put me wise to her love in disguise
She had the body of a venus
Lord imagine my surprise”
Okay, I think that’s a guy, based on admittedly scanty evidence. Arguments against: no Adam’s apple, no sign of bulge below. Arguments in favor: very masculine face, hair looks like wig, model looks as if posed to hide “tuck,” use of word “fabulous” in profile/shop description…eh, the court is still out. I’ll have to do further research. (Still, either way, I’m NOT buying “vintage” undewear!). In either case, the model really should have stuffed that bra; it detracts from the rest of the look.
Ok, now, from one tg person to another… GIRL GET SOME HORMONES!… although, good tuck. As my drag queen friends always say, the best way to hide it is around the back and up the crack… Now… about the boob job…
Is it just me or does that bra look like it’s inside-out? Also, putting a BettiePage-do on a model does not magically turn a garment into a burlesque garment.
Maybe the knickers are good for burlesque. Fabric that old would tear off pretty easily. The downside, you could only use them once.
Wow. Here’s hoping this crew never finds my FB page – I’d hate to hear what they thought about MY looks. And this girl (yes, girl) isn’t overweight or unattractive. What, if you don’t look like Angelina Jolie nowadays you’re free game?
I would recommend she go to her local mall and be measured for an appropriate bra size (it’s free!). Or better yet, she should find the local trannys in her area- THEY know how to stuff a bra.
Now go ahead and mark me down.
#48 MmeZeeZee:
Seriously, I think most stores only carry bras in 36B and 38B. Finding the Holy Grail is easier than finding a 32-anything. Sure, I could order from a catalog, but I’m taking a big chance when it’s something non-returnable.
I hate the way I look in photos. I’m sure others do, too.
Vintage clothing can be very interesting and fun, but I drawer the line at used panties. Heh.
“It”?! People are actually calling her “it”? Look, I agree this is Regretsy material…horrible picture, horrible bra, sketchy used panties. But I don’t give a flying fuck whether she was originally a she or not, referring to someone as “it” is an awful thing to do.
For the very first time, I almost agree with the flouncers: some of you people are horrible. (Not most of you, as evidenced by all the down-voting, and not April…but some.)
That’s the last time I let my roommate borrow my underthings. I’m so sick of finding her whoring out my clothing on the internet. That shit is a quality Vanity Fair 2 for one Marshalls bra.
I sort of hate how many Regretsy comment threads devolve into “Hurr hurr hurr! I don’t think that woman is actually a woman!”
Here, you’ve been presented with someone selling OLD USED UGLY UNDERPANTS ONLINE and the only response many of you can muster is to wonder what the model’s genitals look like. Missing the point much?
I’m guessing the model insisted on keeping those hot pink underwear on underneath of those black bicycle shorts since she was afraid they’d make her lady bits disappear upon contact, like that hideous bra may have done to her upper half. Poor thing.
I sell dozens of those vintage cotton bras (which really DO look sexy when sized properly), but I take a few minutes to dye them pretty colors first, so I don’t look like a lazy trust fund kid peddling dirty grandma clothes.
I joined up just to say I think the people who are making fun of the way this person looks are really shitty. I think she’s very pretty. I’d like to see how some of you look and then taunt you for every minute flaw you have. I don’t think she looks like a man at all, but even if she is genetically male, what gives you the right to degrade her?
The fact that she’s selling used panties on Etsy is funny. Laugh at that and make fun of that all you want. But don’t insult someone horribly just because they’re not the utmost example of pure feminine beauty (and I think this woman is pretty damn attractive anyway).
Definitely not my grandmother’s panties. Or my mother’s. Or mine. I like my underwear to be comfortable-those things look like they’d chafe like a bitch!
btw, somebody needs to explain to this seller that “vintage” is not the same thing as “used”. i’d be willing to bet that either of those things can be found at jcpenney.
Even if I had a moment of insanity and wore something like this, I’d have to walk everywhere with my hands on my head, or I’d have a muffin top the second I put my arms down.
@ #84 glueyourfingers and all the rest who have their panties in a bunch about the “mannish” comments … the vast majority of the comments about the model looking mannish are not really about bagging on the model but rather, as #82 angel drawers said, “everyone takes a bad photograph sometimes, but not everyone posts their bad photographs online to sell underwear.” The model/seller decided that the best way to advertise a hard to pull off look from questionable sources was an incredibly unflattering photo. It doesn’t matter if she is TG, a drag queen, or genetically female, she decided that the best way to advertise a piece intended to evoke the hyper feminine 50′s pin-up look was a picture where she looks as masculine as possible. That contrast is funny. It isn’t like she couldn’t have taken a different picture to post.
Aw, come on… she definitely looks like a woman. A brunette who is slightly reminiscent of Patricia Arquette – albeit having a bad day. As for that nightmare called a panty… of course they’re not my grandma’s No self-respecting grandmother would be caught dead in those (or anyone else for that matter). And the closer I look, it appears that she’s wearing that bra inside-out. All-in-all, definitely not a good look for her.
February 11, 2011 at 9:33 am
The allure of used underwear is lost on me.
Can someone loan her a pair of socks to stuff Grandma’s bra?
February 11, 2011 at 9:35 am
When you say her, did you mean he? Or am I not paying attention?!
*goes back for a closer look*
February 11, 2011 at 9:35 am
Nice tuck job Sir!
February 11, 2011 at 9:35 am
I should hope those aren’t my grandma’s panties. My grandma’s been dead for over 20 years.
February 11, 2011 at 9:36 am
Hmmm… s/he’s a prime candidate for a ‘guess the gender’ Christmas special Maury. I mean, it could go either way.
February 11, 2011 at 9:36 am
This is great! I love walking around in my underwear, but hate having my belly button exposed. And I can store all my bras inside that one while I wear it!
February 11, 2011 at 9:37 am
Pretty good, you can’t even see where the penis is hiding!
February 11, 2011 at 9:37 am
I would never wear underwear that’s been preworn. And she has a ton of support for such a little bosom. I usually don’t comment badly about people but this is just bad bad bad.
February 11, 2011 at 9:37 am
At least her pits are shaved.
February 11, 2011 at 9:38 am
They’re definitely…… magic knickers.
Yeeeah
February 11, 2011 at 9:39 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 9:40 am
My vote is “female”. Even transvestites have more boobidge than that.
Next time wear the bra backwards… like my REAL grandma did.
February 11, 2011 at 9:42 am
#11 – Not completely tell-tale. I manage to have BOTH boobs and man hands. (Damn German genes).
February 11, 2011 at 9:43 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 9:45 am
I’m tired of the Crying Game.
February 11, 2011 at 9:45 am
Oh, also, I’m pretty sure there is something on under the underwear. I do see some hot pink there… but it could be part of it. I have no proof!
February 11, 2011 at 9:46 am
Oh jeez! I just had a flashback of those weird magazines I found in the bottom of my Dad’s sock drawer.
February 11, 2011 at 9:48 am
“Vintage” must be a magic word in some parallel universe that would negate the fact that you’re buying underwear worn by random strangers.
February 11, 2011 at 9:56 am
Perfect under those hot Mom jeans.
February 11, 2011 at 9:57 am
There are pantsuits that cover less than that.
February 11, 2011 at 9:58 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 9:59 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 10:00 am
You could suspend a bridge with that bra.
February 11, 2011 at 10:00 am
She sells retro clothing. They’re someone’s fucking grandmother’s panties.
http://www.etsy.com/shop/flipflopmermaid?ref=seller_info
February 11, 2011 at 10:02 am
My grandmother’s underwear is actually WAY more stylish than that.
February 11, 2011 at 10:04 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 10:07 am
How is this not John Travolta? Please, somebody tell me.
February 11, 2011 at 10:07 am
@25, Rad, this is retro clothing. The “art” comes from the eye of the seller when she peruses the obituaries in search of inventory sources.
February 11, 2011 at 10:13 am
Those aren’t your grandmother’s biceps, either.
February 11, 2011 at 10:14 am
IT’S A TRAP!
February 11, 2011 at 10:16 am
@23 Bills, my grandmother never had “fucking panties”… maybe this is why.
February 11, 2011 at 10:17 am
These are not your grandma’s panties. They’re her girdle.
February 11, 2011 at 10:17 am
So many thoughts spring to mind!
“That Bra doesn’t fit”
“Oh, because that is a man”
look at store
“IS that a man? I don’t know! Gender confusion!”
*sobbing*
Who wears bras like that if they don’t have to? I expend a great deal of energy trying to find bras in my size that DON’T look like that. I guess the grass is always greener on the other side … curly haired girls want straight hair and flat chested women want ugly bras.
February 11, 2011 at 10:22 am
It looks more like a nursing bra than a retro bra.
February 11, 2011 at 10:22 am
In the 1800′s that was considered a thong.
February 11, 2011 at 10:24 am
Amy Winehouse actually looks pretty good in this pic!
February 11, 2011 at 10:30 am
That looks like my jogging bra. But I fill up my DDs.
February 11, 2011 at 10:35 am
Is anyone else seeing John Travolta?
February 11, 2011 at 10:39 am
Damn right those aren’t my grandma’s panties; that lady had some downright sexy stuff, not boring industrial-strength knickers.
(side note: there’s sort of a weird feeling when you’re clearing out a deceased grandmother’s closets and you realise that all her undergarments are a lot nicer and more come-hither than yours.)
Also, I imagine that being able to purchase those fresh off the model’s twat will be a big hit with the dirty panty fetish crowd.
February 11, 2011 at 10:44 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 10:45 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 10:46 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 10:49 am
Unfortunately, this reminds me of the time I woke up in Tijuana with a bad headache, a tattoo, and no wallet. If it weren’t for the donkey and hooker named Brutus, I would have never made it home. Strange for a Mexican girl to be named Brutus,….
February 11, 2011 at 11:01 am
MAG, if that amount of celulite bothers you, you are in for a lifetime of disappointment.
February 11, 2011 at 11:02 am
“Other: Clean- no stains”
::shudder:: I guess that’s something to be thankful for when buying something that has been that close to someone’s ass.
February 11, 2011 at 11:05 am
I have a hard time enough time buying second hand shoes and those just go on my feet. There’s no way I would buy used panties, no matter whose granny wore them. That’s taking the vintage verisimilitude too far.
February 11, 2011 at 11:11 am
Amy Winehouse meets Bea Arthur.
February 11, 2011 at 11:12 am
If you think it’s easy to find an adorable A-cup, let me tell you what. It’s not. However, that is why A-cups should not be modeling in their ugly bras on Etsy. What were they thinking?!?
February 11, 2011 at 11:18 am
http://www.etsy.com/listing/66750312/retro-pinup-bra
Oh. There it is. A cup in a C cup.
February 11, 2011 at 11:19 am
Vintage panties, eh? So when you say you catch crabs from them you can impress your friends by saying, “Yeah, but they’re vintage crabs. These aren’t your grandma’s pubic lice.”
February 11, 2011 at 11:24 am
My grandma wouldn’t be able to stuff her kangaroo pouch into those things anyway.
February 11, 2011 at 11:37 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 11:39 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 11:40 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 11:41 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 11:41 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 11:45 am
Is it just me or does that bra look like it’s inside-out? Also, putting a BettiePage-do on a model does not magically turn a garment into a burlesque garment.
Maybe the knickers are good for burlesque. Fabric that old would tear off pretty easily. The downside, you could only use them once.
February 11, 2011 at 11:49 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 11:51 am
If I wanted pre-worn panties I’d go to Japan and get them out of a vending machine like everybody else
February 11, 2011 at 11:54 am
Simply having dark hair and bangs does not make you Betty Paige
February 11, 2011 at 12:01 pm
ugh. no spanx!
February 11, 2011 at 12:11 pm
Wow. Here’s hoping this crew never finds my FB page – I’d hate to hear what they thought about MY looks. And this girl (yes, girl) isn’t overweight or unattractive. What, if you don’t look like Angelina Jolie nowadays you’re free game?
I would recommend she go to her local mall and be measured for an appropriate bra size (it’s free!). Or better yet, she should find the local trannys in her area- THEY know how to stuff a bra.
Now go ahead and mark me down.
February 11, 2011 at 12:19 pm
Personally, I prefer the “Fesh Mint Sweater” also available.
February 11, 2011 at 12:36 pm
Retro panties that used to belong to someone else. Yours would be the third crotch on that skid-marked cotton liner.
February 11, 2011 at 12:37 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 1:09 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 1:23 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 1:27 pm
@#45 MmeZeeZee :
It’s not “retro pinup bra” if you can get the same bra from Playtex in your size.
February 11, 2011 at 1:29 pm
Compare and save your dignity:
http://www.etsy.com/listing/66750312/retro-pinup-bra
vs.
http://www.sevensidedcube.net/wp-content/uploads/672518_fpx.tif.jpg
February 11, 2011 at 1:36 pm
She’s a girl. And she’s pretty, too. Look at this listing.
http://www.etsy.com/listing/61572137/dont-fight-the-blues-50s-shirt
Everyone takes a bad photograph sometimes, people.
February 11, 2011 at 2:11 pm
#48 MmeZeeZee:
Seriously, I think most stores only carry bras in 36B and 38B. Finding the Holy Grail is easier than finding a 32-anything. Sure, I could order from a catalog, but I’m taking a big chance when it’s something non-returnable.
I hate the way I look in photos. I’m sure others do, too.
Vintage clothing can be very interesting and fun, but I drawer the line at used panties. Heh.
February 11, 2011 at 2:39 pm
“It”?! People are actually calling her “it”? Look, I agree this is Regretsy material…horrible picture, horrible bra, sketchy used panties. But I don’t give a flying fuck whether she was originally a she or not, referring to someone as “it” is an awful thing to do.
For the very first time, I almost agree with the flouncers: some of you people are horrible. (Not most of you, as evidenced by all the down-voting, and not April…but some.)
February 11, 2011 at 2:50 pm
That’s the last time I let my roommate borrow my underthings. I’m so sick of finding her whoring out my clothing on the internet. That shit is a quality Vanity Fair 2 for one Marshalls bra.
February 11, 2011 at 2:59 pm
“I’m throwing in the bra for free, same deal as the panties. No charge for the personal fluids or sweat stains. Don’t let this one get away!”
February 11, 2011 at 3:11 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 11, 2011 at 3:15 pm
Also after looking at the posts…why are we making fun of the model? Isn’t the shit she’s wearing humiliation enough?
February 11, 2011 at 3:29 pm
I sort of hate how many Regretsy comment threads devolve into “Hurr hurr hurr! I don’t think that woman is actually a woman!”
Here, you’ve been presented with someone selling OLD USED UGLY UNDERPANTS ONLINE and the only response many of you can muster is to wonder what the model’s genitals look like. Missing the point much?
February 11, 2011 at 3:49 pm
I’ve seen these somewhere before…oh right, on Mary-Anne from Giligan’s Island!
February 11, 2011 at 4:54 pm
I’m guessing the model insisted on keeping those hot pink underwear on underneath of those black bicycle shorts since she was afraid they’d make her lady bits disappear upon contact, like that hideous bra may have done to her upper half. Poor thing.
February 11, 2011 at 4:56 pm
I thought SHE was pretty too, just too small for that bra.
February 11, 2011 at 5:03 pm
I sell dozens of those vintage cotton bras (which really DO look sexy when sized properly), but I take a few minutes to dye them pretty colors first, so I don’t look like a lazy trust fund kid peddling dirty grandma clothes.
February 11, 2011 at 5:42 pm
#70 freckleyredhead, everyone takes a bad photograph sometimes, but not everyone posts their bad photographs online to sell underwear.
February 11, 2011 at 6:14 pm
Hmm. Spunky expression thar. Wouldn’t mind seeing her without the bra…
February 11, 2011 at 6:44 pm
I joined up just to say I think the people who are making fun of the way this person looks are really shitty. I think she’s very pretty. I’d like to see how some of you look and then taunt you for every minute flaw you have. I don’t think she looks like a man at all, but even if she is genetically male, what gives you the right to degrade her?
The fact that she’s selling used panties on Etsy is funny. Laugh at that and make fun of that all you want. But don’t insult someone horribly just because they’re not the utmost example of pure feminine beauty (and I think this woman is pretty damn attractive anyway).
February 11, 2011 at 6:45 pm
I wonder how much I would get paid to model in used, unflattering underwear. $20 for a few photos?
February 11, 2011 at 7:17 pm
Nope, not my grandmother’s panties, but most definitely my mother’s bra.
February 11, 2011 at 7:28 pm
Definitely not my grandmother’s panties. Or my mother’s. Or mine. I like my underwear to be comfortable-those things look like they’d chafe like a bitch!
February 11, 2011 at 9:03 pm
She looks confident. That’s sexy, right?
February 11, 2011 at 9:24 pm
undies: american apparel. buy them used off etsy: you save 10 bux!!!
February 11, 2011 at 9:32 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 12, 2011 at 12:09 pm
at least it’s not tagged ‘steampunk’
btw, somebody needs to explain to this seller that “vintage” is not the same thing as “used”. i’d be willing to bet that either of those things can be found at jcpenney.
February 12, 2011 at 4:21 pm
I think her 18 hours are up in that bra.
February 12, 2011 at 9:09 pm
Not MY grandma’s panties, no….whose, then? :-/
Even if I had a moment of insanity and wore something like this, I’d have to walk everywhere with my hands on my head, or I’d have a muffin top the second I put my arms down.
February 13, 2011 at 5:13 am
On the contrary, #90. Don’t by it because you DO know where it’s been.
February 13, 2011 at 7:15 am
@ #84 glueyourfingers and all the rest who have their panties in a bunch about the “mannish” comments … the vast majority of the comments about the model looking mannish are not really about bagging on the model but rather, as #82 angel drawers said, “everyone takes a bad photograph sometimes, but not everyone posts their bad photographs online to sell underwear.” The model/seller decided that the best way to advertise a hard to pull off look from questionable sources was an incredibly unflattering photo. It doesn’t matter if she is TG, a drag queen, or genetically female, she decided that the best way to advertise a piece intended to evoke the hyper feminine 50′s pin-up look was a picture where she looks as masculine as possible. That contrast is funny. It isn’t like she couldn’t have taken a different picture to post.
February 13, 2011 at 10:13 am
@ cecikierk, I’m not the one that put them up on Etsy.
@ Fia, try 32A. Thank you, size inflation.
I never minded how I looked in photos. Thought I looked pretty average, if small. Now I’m feeling all mannish. At least I have a medium-sized nose.
February 13, 2011 at 2:20 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 14, 2011 at 1:11 pm
Aw, come on… she definitely looks like a woman. A brunette who is slightly reminiscent of Patricia Arquette – albeit having a bad day. As for that nightmare called a panty… of course they’re not my grandma’s No self-respecting grandmother would be caught dead in those (or anyone else for that matter). And the closer I look, it appears that she’s wearing that bra inside-out. All-in-all, definitely not a good look for her.
February 20, 2011 at 11:47 am
ahhhhh i know her!!!!!