Comments on: Sunglasses Not Included

By: onotoman

onotoman — Wed, 03 Aug 2011 02:56:47 +0000

Oops at first glance he does look real. I am sure the young mums to be, I mean real young mums, would find this doll and delight to hold and play with.

By: goober

goober — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 05:51:57 +0000

You’re Fired!

By: Rhea Monster

Rhea Monster — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:04:22 +0000

Wait… Does anyone remember the show Lexx? Doesn’t it look just like Stanley the security gaurd?!

By: frootloop

frootloop — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:58:03 +0000

what?!?!? i gotta buy sunglasses 4 it 2???

By: Kludge

Kludge — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:30:43 +0000

From the original artists website:

“The process of reborning a doll is being able to create as realistic baby as possible.

This is achieved by firstly buying or creating a baby corpse to make a doll mould from. It is then neccessary to begin peeling the skin off of the baby’s head, body and limbs through a variety of different techniques to give the doll a very realistic human skin effect. ”

OK, I may have made a few slight modifications to the text…

-1

By: razberries

razberries — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:54:31 +0000

ok, i admit i like to recycle my ‘what if they mated’ jokes to no end…but if david caruso humped a ‘real doll’ (www.realdoll.com) this would be the result…

-2

By: bellafelle

bellafelle — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:13:00 +0000

OH GOD KILL IT BEFORE IT EATS US ALLLLLLLL

By: enamy

enamy — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:16:44 +0000

i literally jumped when i scrolled down to this.

By: TomBee

TomBee — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:01:42 +0000

This baby is exactly how I expected George Burns to look after reincarnation.

http://waiteswebworld.com/oldsite/burns1c.jpg

By: cptfknvicious

cptfknvicious — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:04:56 +0000

if you were to taxidermy an infant it would probably come out something like this.

By: JustJon

JustJon — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:41:31 +0000

One big difference between this and David Caruso… this one is probably a better actor.

By: nikkig

nikkig — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:04:41 +0000

…not THIS freaky one, persay, but one that looked real) would have been seriously damaging to my grief process. And I’m sure any therapist would be discouraging of these substitute babies. I mean, you’re giving love and affection to an inanimate object that will never give you anything back–how can that be good for anyone?

By: nikkig

nikkig — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:00:57 +0000

Creepydolls- Yeah, some people probably do want to have these just as collectables, but I think the weird thing is that most of the collectors actually want to “mother” them due to some feeling of loss (whether of their own children growning up or of a baby who died, or of never being able to conceive). Personally, I think motherisng a doll is a terrible thing to do to yourself–I had a daughter who passed away as an infant and I am certain that becoming attached to something like this (well…

By: justajezabel

justajezabel — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:21:46 +0000

I have never liked baby-dolls, not even as a child, and this is definately NOT an exception! I can’t imagine having this in a room with its creepy glass eyes following me everywhere… Argh! The nightmares I would have!

By: imwithya

imwithya — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:06:07 +0000

Do you think this poor seller has noticed that “the thing” has received almost 6000 views?