There is someone out there who could pull this look off… I am not that person. This seller sure does sell quite a few pieces, so more power to her! I actually really LIKE the Tiger Lily Dress. Not sure where the heck I would go while wearing it….
#16 Yes that’s a good thing, however there’s no amount of bodice boning that could save this thing…and no it’s not sexual, sorry.
This shop is actually pretty hit and miss for me.
I think the unicorn tops are actually pretty creative, and not in a bad way.
Though this is my favorite http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=28084220
If I had someplace cool to wear this too (and an extra $300 laying around I’d wear it.
hm well i give kudos to the girl for trying to make a bad dress look a little better but i have a feeling she was coned into it. maybe that’s what the look on her face is for?
#16 AlmostAD :
“boned” means “uncomfortable.” I don’t know about you, but when I pay $335 to look like half a muppet, I want to feel like I’m tightly wrapped in wire.
Also if I wanted to wear a dress so short it was level with my underpants I’d save myself the 300 bucks and just wear a shirt out with no pants on. (Most of her dresses are this length on her site)
If God had meant us to know what Muppet pubic hair looks like, Sesame Street would not have taken such care to obscure them from the waist down. Won’t someone PLEASE think of the children??
From her vacant facial expression, I would guess that someone made her smoke a shitload of crack, wear the dress and then make her perform the clockwork doll dance from Chitty Chitty bang bang!
this dress is kind of awesome, but what makes this whole post regretsy is the pose and look on the model… does she know what she’s wearing?
is this one of those girls that goes to hollywood and trusts the man who guarantees you’ll be a moviestar after doing his porno?
And now another dress from this seller (which upon first seeing, I thought “I must send this to Regretsy”) is on the front page (11:25pm EST). ETSY really has become a parody of itself, has it not?
October 30, 2009 at 3:07 pm
I just wonder why its tagged “Katy Perry”.
October 30, 2009 at 3:07 pm
That description is full of fail. These are CLEARLY not googly eyes… Googly eyes MOVE, not look like Paris Hilton Wonk Eye Impersonators..
October 30, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Example of what I’m talking about – http://blogs.hoycinema.com/myfiles/paris-mon-amour/paris-hilton-south-park-704946.jpg
October 30, 2009 at 3:08 pm
She could at least try to smile. That dress does not say “fun” at all.
October 30, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
October 30, 2009 at 3:38 pm
At least it doesn’t feature a vagina
October 30, 2009 at 3:39 pm
Unicorn Chaser:
http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=32076157
October 30, 2009 at 3:56 pm
That isn’t a unicorn.. it’s a My Pretty Pony with a dunce cap
October 30, 2009 at 4:22 pm
There is someone out there who could pull this look off… I am not that person. This seller sure does sell quite a few pieces, so more power to her! I actually really LIKE the Tiger Lily Dress. Not sure where the heck I would go while wearing it….
http://www.etsy.com/view_transaction.php?transaction_id=20363358
October 30, 2009 at 4:25 pm
The model’s extreme fierceness saves this garment from looking like just another bloody mop. Way to work it, girl!
October 30, 2009 at 4:37 pm
I hate myself for knowing this, but Katy Perry actually wore a dress that is vaguely like this one: http://www.starpulse.com/news/media/katy-perry-eyes-boobs-1.jpg
October 30, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Tyra Banks would cringe at this photo! Top model, NOT! LOL!! She needs to “Smize” more!
October 30, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Maybe Etsy is corrupting me but if I had an extra $335 bucks to spend I would buy this up. I know I should be ashamed to admit that but I’m not.
October 30, 2009 at 6:31 pm
~~~~ I’m so pretty…,,,…Oh so pretty~~~~~
October 30, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Ha! wow, she is not having any fun in that party dress… I’m not sure I want to be at that party…
Oh, and double ha! Because the unicorn dress was actually one of the items I have flagged on my submissions list!
October 30, 2009 at 6:34 pm
The description states “The bodice is boned.” I’m a guy. Does that mean anything good?
October 30, 2009 at 6:35 pm
If I could re-do my wedding, I think this would have to be what the bridesmaids wear.
October 30, 2009 at 6:55 pm
#1 – I think Katy Perry owns/wore this dress.
October 30, 2009 at 7:05 pm
might be a lady gaga rip off. http://instyleclothes.com/2009/07/14/lady-gaga-muppet-bottom/
October 30, 2009 at 7:10 pm
#16 Yes that’s a good thing, however there’s no amount of bodice boning that could save this thing…and no it’s not sexual, sorry.
This shop is actually pretty hit and miss for me.
I think the unicorn tops are actually pretty creative, and not in a bad way.
Though this is my favorite
http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=28084220
If I had someplace cool to wear this too (and an extra $300 laying around I’d wear it.
October 30, 2009 at 7:53 pm
Okay, I kind of love this actually. For a Halloween costume at least.
October 30, 2009 at 10:25 pm
I’m a little teapot, short and stout,
Here is my handle, here is my spout.
October 30, 2009 at 11:02 pm
hm well i give kudos to the girl for trying to make a bad dress look a little better but i have a feeling she was coned into it. maybe that’s what the look on her face is for?
October 31, 2009 at 9:07 am
Fraggle Frock! LOL
I think this dress of hers is pretty horrendous.
http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?ref=vl_other_1&listing_id=33202550
October 31, 2009 at 10:40 am
Would it be possible for the model to look any less pleased about having to wear this? Wow.
October 31, 2009 at 1:19 pm
#16 AlmostAD :
“boned” means “uncomfortable.” I don’t know about you, but when I pay $335 to look like half a muppet, I want to feel like I’m tightly wrapped in wire.
October 31, 2009 at 3:13 pm
God help the dust bunnies under my bed if I ever get hold of this dress! What a pretty mop it would make.
October 31, 2009 at 4:01 pm
@#21 lucyv- Yeah it would make an ok halloween costume, but £335 is a bit steep!
October 31, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Damnit, I mean $.. stupid English brain.
October 31, 2009 at 5:05 pm
I’d tap that.
October 31, 2009 at 5:10 pm
You’ll have to find it first.
October 31, 2009 at 10:56 pm
I totally saw someone wearing this tonight!! Yes, it is Halloween, but still, it did look pretty silly.
November 1, 2009 at 5:26 am
You know, the one thing that bothers me the most is that the person taking the shot didn’t iron the bedsheet first.
Cheap back drops are ok, but jeebus steam the damn thing!!!
November 1, 2009 at 10:14 am
Not so much “trying to look sexy” as bored and off-balance. Totally goes with the goofy/whimsical theme of the dress.
November 1, 2009 at 10:38 am
Also if I wanted to wear a dress so short it was level with my underpants I’d save myself the 300 bucks and just wear a shirt out with no pants on. (Most of her dresses are this length on her site)
November 2, 2009 at 4:33 am
this dress is a knock off from an amazing label called romance was born. but they did it 2 years ago and made it look hot!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_fsXKaoHw0yU/STaTC6n9JOI/AAAAAAAAAXo/GluCpArztGI/s1600-h/Picture+3.png
November 2, 2009 at 8:37 am
And that was a knock off of this, which was a knock off of this.
November 2, 2009 at 10:30 am
Helen, that was fricken brilliant! The second knock off killed me!
November 2, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Tagged “Katy Perry” because:
http://backseatcuddler.com/2008/11/06/katy-perrys-dress-is-eye-catching/
November 2, 2009 at 2:48 pm
It looks like she’s wearing the pelt of a Fry Guy.
November 2, 2009 at 3:38 pm
#40 damn you, you beat me to my punchline!
LOLL great minds think alike, eh???
http://www.x-entertainment.com/articles/0909/20.jpg
November 3, 2009 at 12:43 am
Looks to me like that duck is missing out on some serious royalties… Get the quacker, justice HK, justice for all foul!
November 3, 2009 at 12:43 am
Sigh… fowl.
November 3, 2009 at 11:52 am
If God had meant us to know what Muppet pubic hair looks like, Sesame Street would not have taken such care to obscure them from the waist down. Won’t someone PLEASE think of the children??
November 3, 2009 at 1:26 pm
From her vacant facial expression, I would guess that someone made her smoke a shitload of crack, wear the dress and then make her perform the clockwork doll dance from Chitty Chitty bang bang!
November 3, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Yes. Although even the clockwork dolls from freaking Barbarella were more attractive.
November 5, 2009 at 5:34 pm
this dress is kind of awesome, but what makes this whole post regretsy is the pose and look on the model… does she know what she’s wearing?
is this one of those girls that goes to hollywood and trusts the man who guarantees you’ll be a moviestar after doing his porno?
November 11, 2009 at 10:22 pm
This sold? I’m horrified.
November 19, 2009 at 1:25 am
Holy shit, I had no idea the Fry Guys from McDonald’s were for sale! I wonder if the seller would make another one like it; Christmas is coming…
December 1, 2009 at 8:26 pm
And now another dress from this seller (which upon first seeing, I thought “I must send this to Regretsy”) is on the front page (11:25pm EST). ETSY really has become a parody of itself, has it not?
December 2, 2009 at 9:09 am
So, just curious why no one has commented on this beautiful creation…
http://www.etsy.com/view_transaction.php?transaction_id=20862757
I would so buy it if they had just one picture of the model with a camel toe & moved Ernie’s hands down so he’s getting big handfuls of my tits.
It would be my new “casual Friday” outfit.
December 4, 2009 at 10:31 pm
I have to say, I like this. I like weird, border-line ugly shit though. I wouldn’t pay 335.00 dollars for it though. Maybe 35.00. Maybe.
September 12, 2010 at 8:22 pm
test